The One Thing that is Not Good [Proper 5B]



The Rev. Jeremiah Williamson
Genesis 3:8-15

The One Thing that is Not Good

In the beginning, when God created the heavens and the Earth, God declared the creation good.  Each new day, something new; each new day, something good: light and darkness, Sun and Moon, the planets in their courses, animals and plants, and a human being – all created by God, all given the ultimate seal of approval.  And at the end of the work, God saw everything that God had made, and indeed, it was very good.

Well, almost everything. After taking some time to look things over, to double-check the work, God caught one aspect of the creation that could not be called good, one oversight in an otherwise flawless creation.  In the second chapter of Genesis, God observes and declares, “It is not good that the man should be alone.”

And so God creates one more thing: a community.  God sees that it is not good for a person to be alone; and so God blesses the first person with another person – a beautiful and generous gift: the gift of relationship.  Just a few verses after the first human relationship is created by God, however, the first cracks of separation appear.

Even though it is not good, the man seems intent to be isolated and alone – creating the kind of separation that inevitably leads to human loneliness.  And this should not surprise us because we see the same thing happen in our own lives and in the lives of others; isolation and broken relationships seem to be conditions of our human existence that we cannot, or will not, shake.  These old stories continue to be very true. 

The stories in Genesis are origin stories – which should not surprise us given the title of the book.  Through story, poetry, and myth, the biblical authors seek to answer questions of ultimate concern – questions about life, death, and existence.  They are not scientific or historical expositions; they are theological reflections – stories about God and humanity, stories of love and sin, cause and effect, chaos and order.     

The story we hear from Genesis today is part of a larger reflection on the origins of sin and separation.  It is a back story.  We live in a world of shattered relationships.  We know that.  We witness the brokenness; we see the devastating consequences.  But when did the first cracks appear?  That is what this story is about.  This story tells us that it barely started before it all started to fall to pieces.

We know that what immediately precedes this morning's text is that Eve and Adam eat of the fruit of “the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil” - the tree of which God forbid Adam to eat.  It was the first act of human disobedience, the first time a person decided that he or she knew better than God – the first of many, many times.

Historically Christians have read a lot into the text that is not there, so let's clear up a couple of misreadings before we consider what is actually in the text.  First, this story has often been subject to misogynistic interpretations, readings used to blame the pain and evil of the world on women.  Often it is suggested that Eve used her sexuality to entice and trick Adam into sharing in her disobedience.  That is not in the text, but probably says more about the reader than the writer.  Also, Adam is with Eve the entire time according to Genesis: when she converses with the serpent, when she questions God's provision, when she takes the fruit and eats.  They are in it together, a package deal, co-workers and companions.  Though he blames her later in the story, Eve does not trick Adam; he is well aware of what is going on.  As now, so it was in the beginning: both man and woman chose disobedience; both chose not to follow God's instructions. 

The other detail of this story that carries a lot baggage in Christian readings is the serpent.  The serpent has long in the Church been equated with the devil.  Again, that is an interpretation; nothing in the text suggests that the serpent is the devil; nothing even suggests that the serpent is evil, in fact.  Tony Cartledge points out, “[T]he serpent does not lie to the woman so much as it asks questions and adds nuances to the truth in a way that leads Eve to have thoughts of her own that lead her to mistrust God's gracious care.  The serpent, then, acts as Eve's alter ego, an inquiring voice that engages her mind in doubt and debate. To this point, one assumes, Adam and Eve had lived in perfect obedience to God. Only when the serpent appears…do they become aware that there is another option: they have the power to choose not to follow God's instructions.”[1]      

And that is what they choose.  Like any good, time-tested myth, the details of the story are purposely sparse – which perhaps is why later readers feel the need to flesh it out.  The fruit was, the author of Genesis tells us, “good for food, a delight to the eyes, and to be desired to make one wise.”  And so Eve ate.  And so did Adam.  God said “don't”; they did. 

The consequences of their decision went far beyond full, satisfied bellies.  They recognize for the first time their nakedness.  Before disobedience, before sin, they lived in complete vulnerability with each other and with God.  The fig leaves, from which they fashioned clothes to cover their bodies, were the first layer of separation, the first step towards isolation.  There was now something between Adam and Eve.  There was now something between humanity and God – a layer of separation that would only grow.

Theologian Paul Tillich famously defined sin as separation.  That is what we see in today's text.  Once sin is introduced into the human story, people hide from God, try to get away – search for separation.  It starts in the human-divine relationship and then spreads.  The man blames the woman; the woman blames the serpent.  It's a self-perpetuating cycle: sin begets separation begets sin begets separation.  And by the end of the story, humanity is once again returning to a state of isolation – disconnected from God, from each other, and from the rest of the creation. 

And it is contagious.  The fruit of the first broken relationship will carry on a legacy of separation.  The sin spreads.  Cain kills Able.  Cain hides from God.  Cain wanders the earth – cut off from human community.  Just another tale of human isolation – our stubborn attempt to hold onto the only thing in creation God could not declare good.

Genesis chapter three gives us the back story of the world we still observe – a world riddled with sin and separation.  And in giving us this ancient back story, Genesis reminds us that the roots are deep.  Genesis also reminds us that God wants something better for us.  God wants us to be together, to live in community.  What we often consider a burden was meant to be a gift.

Why this matters is that we are called to be ministers of reconciliation in this world of brokenness and isolation.  God was right: it is not good for a person to be alone – isolation is bad for us.   George Monbiot recently wrote an article called “The age of loneliness is killing us.”  In it he writes, “Social isolation is as potent a cause of early death as smoking 15 cigarettes a day; loneliness, research suggests, is twice as deadly as obesity. Dementia, high blood pressure, alcoholism and accidents – all these, like depression, paranoia, anxiety and suicide, become more prevalent when connections are cut. We cannot cope alone.”[2]     

We cannot cope alone.  But we continue to try.  We build walls, and dig moats.  We hide our true selves from God and from each other.  And we are lonely.  In the absence of human contact and relationship we try to fill the void with other things – usually harmful things that kill both body and spirit.  Johann Hari writes that: “Professor Peter Cohen argues that human beings have a deep need to bond and form connections. It's how we get our satisfaction. If we can't connect with each other, we will connect with anything we can find -- the whirr of a roulette wheel or the prick of a syringe. He says we should stop talking about 'addiction' altogether, and instead call it 'bonding.' A heroin addict has bonded with heroin because she couldn't bond as fully with anything else.

So the opposite of addiction is not sobriety. It is human connection.”[3]  We cannot cope alone.

We, who have been baptized, we have been made a community.  We are the body of Christ.  And in the body of Christ there are no severed limbs; we are all connected – to God and to each other.  It is what God wants for us.  We who were once alone and isolated, have been made a family – brothers and sisters in the household of God.  God's gift to us is still relationship. 

And as God's people in this world, this is our gift too.  It is not good for anyone to be alone.  And so we are called to open our arms and open our hearts to the lonely and the isolated, to all those people in this world, in this city, in our neighborhoods, desperately longing for human connection.  No one can cope alone.  Our job, as the Church, is to make sure no one has to. 




 


[1]   Sessions with Genesis: The Story Begins, 17.

[2]   http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/oct/14/age-of-loneliness-killing-us

[3]   http://www.huffingtonpost.com/johann-hari/the-real-cause-of-addicti_b_6506936.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Chrism Mass of Holy Week 2024

A Retrospective [Psalm 126 - Advent 3]

By the Rivers of Babylon [Epiphany 5B - Isaiah 40:21-31]