Gender, Sex, and Jesus' Love [Easter 5B]



The Rev. Jeremiah Williamson
Acts 8:26-40

Gender, sex, and Jesus' love

If it seems we have been talking about gender and sexuality in the Church forever, it's probably because we have.  In the past few decades, we've focused most of our energy on the sacraments of ordination and marriage.  We have talked about the ordination of gays and lesbians; we have talked about the blessing of same-sex relationships and the nature of marriage.  Occasionally, we do the conversations well; sometimes we actually dialogue – even disagree – about the complexity of human sexuality in a Christian spirit of generosity, respect, and reconciliation.  More often we do it poorly – disregarding our baptismal vows to love our neighbors as ourselves and to respect the dignity of every human being – leaving the body of Christ fractured. 

But difficult conversations are nothing new to the church.  Since the very birth of our religion, Christians have disagreed and argued.  And, not always well; sadly, one can recount the history of our faith in schisms.  Not every controversy concerns gender and sexuality of course.  But many do – even those in the first century.  Already in the first decades of the Church, Paul addresses arguments around circumcision, gender roles, chastity, and sexual practice. 

In fact, one of the very first stories of the Church post-Pentecost is this story of the Ethiopian eunuch – a story that immediately confronts the reader with complicated questions about gender and sexuality.  Sexuality and gender have always been Church issues because they are life issues.  And the topics are invested with a lot of emotional energy because sexuality is so central to who we are as human beings, tied to our survival as a species and to our pursuit of happiness.  Most of us, in one way or another, identify strongly with our gender or our sex or our sexual orientation.

And so we are often also identified by others by our gender or our sex or our sexual orientation.  And sometimes, especially for those who exist outside of that messy mix of cultural norms and religious expectations, that identification can be meant as insult and wielded to injure and used to justify exclusion.  All of this placed at the forefront our story from Acts this morning.

We know very little about the person featured in today's story.  We don't know his history.  We don't know his relationship to Judaism, how a man living with the Ethiopian royal family would become a worshiper of Yahweh.  We are not even given a name.  He is only identified as an Ethiopian eunuch – and actually, in much of the story simply as “the eunuch.”

Well, perhaps not so simply.   Actually it was a complicated life.  “A eunuch typically refers to a person who has been castrated, often early enough in life to have significant hormonal impacts...”[1]  He lived as an ambiguously gendered person in a world of clearly defined gender roles.  And while his position in the court of a queen sounds prestigious, the eunuch held that position because the King did not have to worry about a eunuch having sex with his wives.  A eunuch was not considered a real man – not a woman, but not quite a man; he couldn't even have sex – and therefore posed no threat to the king or the royal bloodline. 

The eunuch's sexual identity, his gender ambiguity, had defined his life.  Most likely it was not a life he chose, but one forced upon him as a child.  And it impacted everything.  There would be no marriage, no sex, no sexual desire, no possibility of having children through which to pass on his family name.  And though this eunuch, our text tells us, had come to Jerusalem to worship, even that hope was dashed because of his sexual identity.  Because the man was a eunuch, he was not allowed in.  According to the 23rd chapter of Deuteronomy, “No one whose testicles are crushed or whose penis is cut off shall be admitted to the assembly of the Lord.”  That is a verse that does not show up in the Sunday morning Lectionary.  One commentator explains, “[The original] readers [of the book of Acts] know...that the Ethiopian official would not have been permitted to worship in the Temple, not because of his race, nationality, or status, but because of his sexual identity.”[2]

It is an old story – this story from Acts.  But also it is familiar.  People are still turned away from houses of worship because of their sexual identity – because they are gay or lesbian or transgender.  People who desire to know and love and worship God, find the doors of the Church closed to them.  They are being told by the words and actions of Christians that Jesus does not love them.

The eunuch went to the Temple anyway – knowing that he could not go in.  Because while those with religious authority would not let him in the building, he still desired to know and love and worship God.  And while those with religious authority did not want him, God did.

Our text is very clear about this point: the Holy Spirit chose the Ethiopian Eunuch.  The Holy Spirit sent Philip to tell him about Jesus and Jesus' amazing love.  The Spirit plays match-maker in this story.  And once again we are reminded that God's love is impossibly big, God's embrace infinitely wide – beyond what we can fathom or even what we want. 

After hearing the good news of Jesus, the eunuch asks Philip one question.  It is the kind of question someone asks when they already know the answer.  It is the kind of question someone asks when they have grown used to rejection.  “What is to prevent me from being baptized?”  He doesn't tell Philip to baptize him; he doesn't even ask Philip to baptize him.  The eunuch asks, “What is to prevent me from being baptized?”  And he knows the answer.  The answer is always the same: he is a eunuch.  He is damaged goods.  He is sexually abnormal.  He is unwanted.  That is always the answer.  And so that is the question he asks: What is to prevent me?

The truth is too many people are asking that same question of the Church today: what is to prevent me from joining you, from sharing your faith, from experiencing your Jesus?   When I was at St. John's, I spent time with the LGBT group at Youngstown State University.  One day some of the students told me their stories about church.  One young man shared with me, through his tears, how his mother told him he was going to Hell when he came out to her.  That is why he doesn't go to church.  A young woman told me about how the church of her childhood, where she was raised and nurtured, the church that taught her to be a Christian, kicked her out of the church when she told them she was a lesbian.  She told me, “I thought they cared about me until I told them.”  That is why she quit church.  Neither student wanted to leave.  Both students were Christians.  They still loved Jesus.  But the Church did not love them.  The Church failed them.  And there are millions like them in this world – desperate to know the love of Jesus – only those called to share that love choose instead to withhold it, to bar the doors.           
       
Last week millions of people watched as former Olympic champion and world-class athlete, Bruce Jenner, a man who reached the pinnacle of masculine physical achievement, shared with Diane Sawyer and the world that he is transgender.  He said, “For all intents and purposes, I am woman.”  For a lot folks, it was maybe the first time they ever heard someone talk directly about living as transgender.  As the world shrinks, we are discovering that identity and gender and sexuality are not nearly as simple as we might have thought, or even hoped.  And it can be confusing and that can challenge the limitations of our empathy.  It can challenge the depth of our Christian love.

You know, Philip never answered the eunuch's question.  Actually, he never even acknowledged the question.  He just walked him to the water and baptized him.  The eunuch came out of that water and rejoiced.  Of course.  After a lifetimes of nos, Jesus said yes.

Philip came upon a person whose skin was much darker than his own, whose gender was ambiguous, whose sexual identity transgressed religious and cultural norms.  And he welcomed him into the family.  Because that is what Jesus does.  Jesus loves the rejected and the broken and the marginalized and the weirdos and the losers and the queers and the awkward and the lonely and the grumpy and the outsiders and the eunuchs and even the “normals.”  It is crazy and amazing and complicated but also really simple.  This is our good news: Jesus loves us – you and me and everybody else.  In this complex and complicated and oft-divided world, we have one job: not to figure it all out, not to condemn a bunch of people to Hell, not to bar the doors of the Church; our job is to love.  It's that simple.    

          


[1]   Coleman Baker, http://www.workingpreacher.org/preaching.aspx?commentary_id=2445

[2]   Ibid

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Chrism Mass of Holy Week 2024

A Retrospective [Psalm 126 - Advent 3]

By the Rivers of Babylon [Epiphany 5B - Isaiah 40:21-31]