The Third Way [Epiphany 7A]
The
Rev. Jeremiah Williamson
Matthew
5:38-48
The
Third Way
What
is happening here? Seriously, what is happening? Turn the other
cheek? Give your cloak as well? Go the second mile? What kind of
advice is this?
Given
the options of fight or flight, it seems that Jesus is casting a
strong vote for flight – just flight a little too late. Were one
to follow this advice they would fly away with tired legs, a pummeled
face, and no clothes. Generally, you want to do the flight, if that
is the option you choose, before you are hit in the face.
What
is happening here? Seriously. This is a dangerous passage. One
might even be so bold to suggest that Jesus' advice to an
impressionable crowd is irresponsible. Do you have any idea how many
people – mostly women and children – throughout history have been
abused under these instructions? Told to turn the other cheek. Told
not to resist their abusers. Instructed in the name of Jesus to
quietly and passively absorb endless violence – as if that was some
sanctified behavior. Do you have any idea how many pastors have
advised battered women to take their beatings, citing chapter and
verse: Matthew 5:39?
What
is happening here? In a sense understanding the Bible is always us
trying to look back in time. The challenge of that of course is
that, so goes the L. P. Hartley quote, “The past is a foreign
country; they do things differently there.” And so often the Bible
is read divorced of its historical context, as if there is no
interpretation required, as if Jesus and his crowds existed solely in
some timeless vacuum. Studying the Bible is hard work; it is a whole
lot easier to simply read the red letters and twist and turn them to
support all of one's biases and bad behaviors. Like we do with the
news.
It's
stunning to think about how long and how often this passage has been
used to justify abuse and oppression and violence, how often Jesus'
plea for creative non-violent resistance has been misused and
misappropriated. Because that is what this is: Jesus is presenting,
in the Sermon on the Mount, a third way. It is definitely not fight.
But it is also not some passive flight. This is not avoidance or
cowardice. Jesus is giving his crowd of occupied, oppressed, abused
followers a third way: a way of non-violence that condemns our fight;
a way of resistance that challenges our passive silence in the face
of injustice. Jesus challenges his listeners, present company
included, to have the guts to choose another way: the way of creative
non-violent resistance.
But
the truth is: without understanding something of Jesus' context, it
is almost impossible to get that from this text some two-thousand
years later and some seven-thousand miles away. But without taking
that journey, this text can easily be used to justify horrors that
are in direct opposition to Jesus' original intention.
So
what is happening here? Well, let's take for example Jesus' command:
if anyone forces you to go one mile, go also the second mile. This
has become something of a generic motivational catchphrase - “go
the extra mile.” But there is, of course, much more to it. In the
Roman Empire, the Empire in which Jesus and his audience lived, a
Roman soldier was permitted to force an occupied person, in this case
a Jew, once again Jesus and his audience, to carry his pack for one
mile. The soldier was permitted to do this because, well, the Jews
were less important than Roman soldiers and important people tell
less important people what to do. That is how this world most often
works.
To
the Roman soldier, and to the Empire, that Jew might as well have
been an animal, a donkey, a beast of burden – not a really person.
This was a way to publicly humiliate, to belittle, to dehumanize, to
strip another person of their dignity. It was like a white person
sending a black person to the back of the bus. It was a way that the
one with power could use that privilege to make another person feel
less than human – to embarrass and belittle them. It was one of
those small ways that the one with power keeps that power.
So of course, the Jews listening
to Jesus would hate the practice and despise the soldiers who
exploited them. It was a practice that promoted dehumanization by
all the involved parties – both oppressor and oppressed were
dehumanized in the process, seen, on the one hand, as monsters or, on
the other, as animals. And yet Jesus tells his followers to keep
carrying the pack – to continue to voluntarily do something
humiliating, something dehumanizing. Now why would Jesus do this?
Well, there was a limitation to what the soldier could require. A
soldier could only require one mile of one person; to do otherwise
might earn the soldier a punishment. And so carrying the extra mile
was a form of non-violent resistance. It was clever and subversive
in a way that did not require one to take up arms or passively accept
abuse.
But
in the context of Jesus' sermon, I think there is more to it.
Because Jesus doesn't command his followers to shame their enemies.
Jesus requires his followers to love their enemies.
By
choosing to carry the pack an extra mile, the one being humiliated
asserts his or her humanity – denies the oppressor's attempt to
dehumanize – stubbornly claims dignity in the face of indignity.
Walter Wink says, “[Jesus] is formulating a worldly spirituality in
which the people at the bottom of society or under the thumb of
imperial power learn to recover their humanity.”1
It is a powerful action; it is the subversive work of love; the
enemy's salvation depends on his ability to recognize their common
humanity. That can only happen in the second mile – when the walk
becomes a choice – an act of defiant and unexpected kindness. In
that extra mile, both the oppressor and the oppressed become more
human by the power of love – love showed to an enemy. Only by the
power of perfect love can one look into the face of the “enemy”
and see a human being – equally in need of, and worthy of, God's
grace.
That
doesn't happen when the only choices are fight or flight. It only
happens through creative non-violent resistance – the third way,
the way of Jesus, the way of love. And Jesus did not just talk it;
he lived it. Touching the unclean clean. Raising the dead. Freeing
the tortured. Eating with the despised. His ministry challenged,
resisted all of the ways in which people are denied their human
dignity. He was not violent; but he was not passive. And when Jesus
was confronted with the cross, again he didn't fight or flight.
When Jesus was on the cross what he chose was love: Father, forgive
them for they do not know what they are doing. From his cross, he
looked at those who mocked him, who drove the nails through his
wrists and rather than see enemies, he saw the image of God. Even on
the cross, Jesus chose the way of love.
It
was the only way to break the cycle of violence, the only way to
defend the image of God. Non-violent resistance, soaked through with
love, is the most courageous and most difficult action one can take
in this violent world – foolishness to the violent, radical to the
resigned.
Martin
Luther King, Jr., who lived his life and ministry out of this passage
from the Sermon on the Mount, famously said, “Hate cannot drive out
hate; only love can do that.” Guns can't do that. Bombs can't do
that. Force can't do that. Love is an amazing miracle – a miracle
we so often take for granted. And it changes both the giver and the
receiver. In an encounter with love nothing stays the same. When I
love another human being – when I see in that other the face of God
– that other person becomes more human – more human because they
are loved. When I love another human being – when I risk my heart
for another person – I am transformed as well. I become more like
my Heavenly Parent – a little closer to the perfection to which
Jesus calls us in today's Gospel.
So,
what is happening here? Jesus is calling us to imagine a world
beyond fight or flight, to have the courage to choose the third way,
the way of love, to as Thomas Merton so eloquently put it, to “Be
human in this most inhuman of ages; [to] guard the image of humanity
for it is the image of God.”
1 http://www.cres.org/star/_wink.htm
Comments
Post a Comment