Forgiveness [Proper 19A]
The
Rev. Jeremiah Williamson
Matthew
18:21-35
Forgiveness
Peter
could really use a win. Like many students, he just wants to impress
his teacher. And if we're being honest here, some of his previous
attempts have not gone terribly well – especially that time Jesus
called him Satan, in front of the entire class. That stung.
But
you have to give him credit, he is persistent. Once again today, he
musters up his courage and goes for it. I imagine he studied late
into the night, scrutinized the exact wording he would use, practiced
in the mirror. He probably played out the scenario in his head
dozens of times – just to be absolutely sure that this comment
would not again earn him a satanic nickname, but would instead,
garner that most precious prize: a gold star from his rabbi, from his
teacher.
It's
a good question and goes off without a hitch: How often should I
forgive someone who sins against me? As many as seven times? Now, a
lot of people struggle to forgive someone who wrongs them even once.
The ancient rabbis suggested three times – which is fairly
generous. But Peter, he is willing to go the extra mile: seven
times. And then he waits for Jesus' answer – trembling with
anticipation. Just sure that Jesus will come back with something
along the lines of, “Seven times. Well, Peter that is truly above
and beyond. I was going to say once is enough. Your generosity
astounds me. I mean, seven times! Did you hear that guys?!”
Poor
Peter; he really just asks the wrong person. Jesus' standards are
always ridiculously high. If he would have asked someone else the
same question, he would have likely received that gold star. I know
I'm impressed any time someone chooses to forgive because many people
prefer vengeance or hold grudges instead. And we understand that
because we all know that forgiveness is incredibly difficult. It
always feels a little like a loss. Seven times then sounds like a
lot of times to forgive someone.
Jesus'
response to Peter seems, at first glance, rather arbitrary, as if he
is just being difficult: “Not seven times, but seventy-seven
times.” But it's not. You see, there is a little poem found early
in the book of Genesis attributed to one of Cain's descendants,
Lamech, that reads, “I have killed a man for wounding me, a young
man for striking me. If Cain is avenged sevenfold, truly Lamech
seventy-sevenfold.” The poem traces the escalation of violence in
human history. It details, poetically, this cycle of violence in
which injury begets death, in which one wrong is avenged
seventy-seven times over. The poem brazenly challenges the divine
inclination towards forgiveness. It flexes its muscle rather than
dare take the loss.
Jesus'
response is not arbitrary, neither is it accidental. Biblical
scholar Stanley Saunders, concludes, Jesus
is calling his community of disciples to participate in undoing the
curse of Cain and Lamech that has kept their offspring trapped in
spasms of envy, hatred, violence, and retribution across the
generations to this day.1
Jesus imagines that forgiveness has the power to break the cycles of
violence and vengeance. Jesus imagines that forgiveness frees us
from an economy of debt to live in an economy of mercy.
The
parable that Jesus tells drops us directly into an economy of debt.
Before we look at this parable though it is important for us to
remember that it is in fact a parable – not an allegory. And there
is a difference. Parables are stories that teach by using familiar
situations with just enough of a twist to keep the listeners' minds
churning and puzzling. An allegory is different; it assigns a
defined correlation to each character in the story.
This
story is a parable. The basic economic system found in the parable
would have been familiar to Jesus' audience. It was something like a
pyramid – with money and power flowing steadily to the top, in this
case the top is represented by the king. Under the king were levels
of servants who were expected to collect debts and taxes from those
below them. As the money flowed to the top, each new collector would
take a cut. That was how they supported themselves. As long the
person above you in the pyramid, in the hierarchy, was getting what
they expected, everything was good. I mean, not for the person on
the very bottom of the scheme, but in the sense that the system was
sustainable.
One
example of the model with which we are familiar in the Bible is the
story of Zacchaeus. We remember in the Gospel of Luke, Zacchaeus was
a chief tax collector and was rich. He was obviously close to the
top of the economic pyramid – not unlike the unmerciful slave in
Jesus' parable today. You might also remember that Zacchaeus was not
well liked. That was not because he was rich and folks were simply
jealous; it was because he extracted taxes from his fellow Jews that
supported the occupying Roman government; and not just that, he also
made sure to extract extra to pad his own pockets. He charged them
for the privilege of paying for their own oppression. It wasn't
illegal; in fact that was just the way things were. It was an
economy of debt in which everyone owed someone something. And that
of course was the cause of a lot of bad blood.
And
so Jesus' audience would have been very familiar with this economic
system; it was the one under which they lived. Again, parables begin
with a familiar concept. But then things get wacky. The first twist
in Jesus' story is the impossibly large debt the first slave has
accumulated. This is where 2000 years really obscures the original
impact of the parable. Ten-thousand talents would have been a
comically outrageous amount to Jesus' listeners. To us, ten-thousand
talents means nothing. We don't talk in talents. To put it in
perspective though, one talent was equal to approximately fifteen
years' wages for the average laborer. This slave is short
ten-thousand talents. It would take him about 150,000 years to pay
off his debt. That is a lot of years. The audience would understand
that the debt was impossible, absolutely impossible, to pay back.
And then would be amazed, shocked, that the king would forgive that
extraordinary debt.
They
of course would also find it shocking that that same slave would then
throw a man in prison who owed him just one-hundred days worth of
money. The first guy was forgiven, remember, 150,000 years worth of
debt and then is absolutely unforgiving, unmerciful, towards the one
who owed a very manageable debt equivalent to 100 days' wages –
something like a car loan. And to add to the absurdity, the harsh
slave throws the other slave into prison where of course he will be
unable to work and therefore unable to pay.
Many
years ago, in the ancient desert, there was a meeting [in a monastic
community] about a brother who had sinned. The Fathers spoke, but
Abba Pior kept silence. Later, he got up and went out; he took a
sack, filled it with sand and carried it on his shoulder. He put a
little sand also into a small bag which he carried in front of him.
When the Fathers asked him what this meant he said, 'In this sack
which contains much sand, are my sins which are many; I have put them
behind me so as not to be troubled about them and so as not to weep;
and see here are the little sins of my brother which are in front of
me and I spend my time judging them. This is not right, I ought
rather to carry my sins in front of me and concern myself with them,
begging God to forgive me for them.' The Fathers stood up and said,
'Truly, this is the way of salvation.'2
In
the parable, the first slave was released by the king from the
economy of debt – an economy that was destroying him. But he chose
instead to cling to the system. He was freed and yet chose to
enslave himself once again. He was forgiven an impossible debt and
yet chose not to forgive others.
Jesus
imagines that forgiveness has the power to break the cycles of
violence and vengeance. Jesus imagines that forgiveness frees us
from an economy of debt to live in an economy of mercy.
This
parable is actually quite simple. But it does require us to be
honest about our baggage. If we forget that God has freed us from
the heavy bag of sand we carried on our backs, we will be confined to
a merciless existence – one in which we are trapped in a cycle of
vengeance. Ready forever to inflict our pain on others, who will in
turn pay that pain forward. It is a story as old as Cain.
But
that is not what God wants for us. God is a God of liberation. We see this in today's Old Testament lesson. The
God who freed the people from slavery in Egypt, longs also to free us
from the economy of debt and bring us into an economy of mercy.
Every absolution is a lesson. God is teaching us to be merciful by
example.
Jesus
is calling his community of disciples to participate in undoing the
curse of Cain and Lamech that has kept their offspring trapped in
spasms of envy, hatred, violence, and retribution across the
generations to this day.3
He is calling us not only with this parable, but also by the example
of his life and his death. He forgave even those who crucified him
from the cross.
We
are all debtors – both victim and perpetrator – with nothing to
do but collapse into the mercy of God. And that means, in life, we
have a choice: to obsess over all the ignorant, mean, hurtful,
misguided things that other people do, to hold tightly to our
grudges, to enact vengeance on those who cause us pain or we
can look past all of that and gaze into the overwhelming mercy of
God. Which is not to say that we don't confront sin in the life of
the Church and the World; we do have a responsibility to confront
evil and injustice. We just have a strange way of doing it. We are
called to overcome evil with good; we respond to violence with love;
and we answer the cycles of vengeance with forgiveness.
It's
not easy. But as those old desert Fathers might say, “This is the
way of salvation.” - for both the one who forgives and for the one
who is forgiven.
1 http://www.workingpreacher.org/preaching.aspx?commentary_id=3393
2 The
Sayings of the Desert Fathers, 469.
3 http://www.workingpreacher.org/preaching.aspx?commentary_id=3393
Comments
Post a Comment