Resurrection [Easter 3B]
The Rev. Jeremiah Williamson
Luke 24:36b-48
Resurrection
I think Easter season is great. Don’t you think it’s great? There is so much joy and excitement in the
church. There are alleluias all over the
liturgy. The lessons are interesting –
so full of wonder and amazement. The new
Paschal Candle is burning every week; it looks so good back there by the
font. And at my house, when the kids
aren’t paying attention, there is still some Easter candy up for grabs. It’s just a great season. It feels good living in Eastertide.
I like everything about this season. Well, I mean, there is one thing. And I don’t want to seem like I am
complaining; this is a great Church season.
But we are sort of forced to think about and talk about perhaps our
strangest creedal doctrine an awful lot: resurrection.
Now don’t get me wrong.
I am big fan of the resurrection.
But it is just not the easiest theological subject to discuss with one’s
friends. And frankly, the biblical
accounts do not make it much easier.
They are marked mostly by confusion, fear, and doubt. So really, I think it is fair to say: the
biblical accounts feel like very honest reactions to a rather stunning event –
an event that continues to challenge the world almost as much as it is saving
the world.
Resurrection seems to pop up everywhere during the Easter
season. We find it in the Creed – both
Apostles’ and Nicene. It runs through
the baptismal liturgies that we celebrate at the beginning and end of this
season. And though heaven is the much
more popular after-life subject, our Christian doctrine would remind us that
our hope is embodied. And if we believe
Paul’s epistles and the book of Revelation, our final destiny is life in a
resurrected body and our final destination is not some spiritual, harp-filled
Care Bear Kingdom in the clouds but a new Earth. We are following in the footsteps of Jesus. He gets resurrection and so do we. It is such a strange idea that most
Christians don’t even know that bodily resurrection is one of the primary
theological assertions of our faith.
And it is all because of what happened on the first Easter
Sunday. But, you know, there were other
ways to tell that story – ways that would have made much more sense in the
ancient world and fit more comfortably in a modern religious landscape that
seems more ready to embrace a disembodied spiritual journey than the idea of
living forever in a body 2.0. The gospel
authors could have given us with a ghost story; that, after all, was the
disciples’ first reaction. In the
ancient world there are plenty of stories about ghostly encounters. Especially in the season of grief, following
a death, it was not unusual for the living to have some experience of their
dearly departed. And not just in the
ancient world: it is not unusual to hear these stories still today.
Had the eleven, scared, grieving, hiding behind locked doors,
had a shared encounter with the spirit of Jesus, I am sure that too would have
been a powerful event in their lives.
Had the Spirit of Jesus sent them into the world with a mission, that
encounter would have been compelling enough to get them to vacate the locked
room and get to work. There is a strong
tradition in the Bible of God speaking to people through visions. Why not to the disciples? They could have told stories about the spirit
of Jesus. A message from the spirit of a
dead holy man, a martyr, a miracle worker, could have laid the foundation for
the movement. Other religions traditions
do not claim that their founder was resurrected. Everybody dies; there is no shame in
that. They could have established the
Church on a miraculous encounter with, a vision of, the spirit of Jesus. But they didn’t. They said resurrection.
Or…They knew this guy named Lazarus who was resuscitated –
dead and then came back to life. He was
the same guy when he exited the tomb as he was upon entry – easily recognizable
as the same man. He was dead and then
alive and then, eventually, he would again die.
But even though it was just death delayed, it was still a pretty big
deal.
Because of Lazarus, the disciples knew that resuscitation was
possible. And that too would have been a
great story – with at least some historical precedent. They could have told stories about Jesus, their
friend who was dead, being resuscitated, charging them with the earthly
continuation of his work, and then riding off into the sunset to live a
peaceful life far from the Roman Empire that killed him the first time. That is still a compelling story. They could have told that story. But they didn’t. They said resurrection.
And resurrection had no precedent. Visions had a track record. Resuscitation: Jesus raised a few people from
the dead in the Gospels. Resurrection:
it had never before happened – and, by the way, has not happened since. Now, the basic idea was around. Some pious first century Jews believed in the
concept of resurrection. But not like
this. No one expected one person to be
resurrected out of sequence. The
resurrection of the body was thought to be a one-time event – all of the dead,
together, at the end of time. Most Jews
in the first century believed that God watched after the souls of the dead and
one day, the last day, would raise them to new life, in new bodies. That was
resurrection. And because that was how
Jews, including the disciples, understood the doctrine of resurrection no one
was expecting to see Jesus walking around alive and in a resurrected body. That was simply not a possibility. It was unheard of - until it happened.
Resurrection was not in the disciples’ plans. The Gospels make this very obvious. This kind of resurrection, a solo
resurrection in the midst of on-going time, was unbelievable – in that no one
would ever believe it. And if your goal
is to convince people, your story should probably be at least somewhat
believable.
No one would believe it, neither would they expect it. Which is why, for the second consecutive
Sunday, our Gospel lesson finds the disciples locked in a room on the evening
of Easter. It is also why, when Jesus
appears to them, they are “startled and terrified, and thought they were seeing
a ghost.” Even after Jesus shows them
the scars, the only remnant of death that remained in this new body, Luke tells
us they were still disbelieving. Now it
is true that Jesus did talk to them about his death and resurrection before the
cross, but the disciples had no way to process that information because not
only was resurrection unprecedented, theologically it meant something entirely
different from what they experienced on Easter Sunday.
And I think that is why the post-resurrection stories are all
so odd. The writers are trying to
explain the unexplainable, trying to tell a story that even they know makes no
rational sense.
Think about the stories in the Gospels. They are not the most convincing stories were
one writing them to simply convince. In
Mark’s Gospel, the women come to the tomb to anoint the dead body and flee
without saying anything to anyone because of fear; in John’s Gospel Mary
Magdalene confuses the resurrected Jesus for a gardener, whom she is pretty
sure stole the corpse; in the story that precedes today’s in Luke’s Gospel, two
of Jesus’ followers meet Jesus on the road out of town, to Emmaus, and precede
to explain to Jesus what happened to Jesus in Jerusalem; they finally recognize
him at dinner and then when they do he disappears – something bodies, living or
otherwise, don’t generally do. And then
we have today’s Gospel, in which Jesus appears out of nowhere, like a ghost
might. They are quickly disavowed of
that ghost idea when their dead friend sits down at their dinner table and
woofs down some fish. It was a lot of
process. No one saw this coming. And those who encountered the Risen Christ
had no idea what to make of it or him.
And everyone, in every story, is confused and scared.
Easter Sunday was the end of a dizzying week for Jesus’
followers. They probably were feeling
pretty good on Palm Sunday, when Jesus was welcomed into the city by joyous
crowds. But Thursday night he was
arrested and on Friday he was crucified and buried. And so obviously the joy is gone and it has
been replaced by grief, shame, and disappointment. As the disciples on the road to Emmaus said,
“We had hoped that he was the one who would redeem Israel.” Which is to say, he is now dead and so we
were very, very wrong. And then Sunday
happens and Jesus is standing in front of them and then eating dinner with
them. And soon enough, days later,
floating into the sky – not as a ghost but in a body that is new enough that
some of his closest friends do not immediately recognize him.
There are not words to make sense of Easter, but they have to
try. And so amazingly, they begin to
share their impossible stories. The
women who find the tomb empty, who flee the graveyard in terror, tell their
stories. And the disciples, whose doubt
and shame and fear, confines them to a secret hideout, they tell their
stories. And the disciples on the road
to Emmaus, the ones who walked with Jesus and failed to recognize him, tell
their stories. They tell impossible
stories. Stories that sounded foolish to
the gentiles and sounded blasphemous to their fellow Jews.
They had options after Easter. They could have gone back to the lives they
left, cut their losses and moved on – talked about the Jesus’ years at
apostolic family reunions. They could
have told stories of spirits and visions – disembodied revelations. They could have claimed to have witnessed
another resuscitation. All of those
stories were to some degree more believable, more socially acceptable.
But they preached resurrection. They believed in resurrection. They staked their lives on resurrection. And there is really no way to make sense of
that…unless it is the Truth.
As a post-Vatican 2 Catholic, I left the Church. I had had enough. Since that time I have wandered the through proverbial wilderness visiting The Episcopal Church, Lutheran Church, thanking God for the return of the Tridentine Rite and trying even harder to accept the post-conciliar church. Nothing has worked. I have pondered the Resurrection. I am in the woods on this concept, as well as that of a supreme being. And the mystery of the Trinity does nothing for me. It truly makes little sense. As Jesus was dying on the cross he asks his Father why he has forsaken him. He is THE Father, so he cries out to himself and on it goes. I think I will leave my thoughts here for now.
ReplyDelete