Body [Epiphany 3C / Annual Meeting Sunday]
The Rev. Jeremiah Williamson
1 Corinthians 12:12-31a
Body
Someone in this room, in the very room in which we are now
gathered, is a kidney. Someone else in
this room is an eyeball. Or at least
that is what the Apostle Paul would have us believe, that is the analogy he
spins in today’s reading from his first letter to the Corinthians.
There are many metaphors and analogies used to make sense of
the Church – this mysterious mystical Christian community of which each
baptized person is a member. The image
of the Body of Christ is one of the most enduring – perhaps because we all have
bodies and each of those bodies is made of basically the same parts. Being embodied is a universal human, and
divine, experience.
We all have kidneys, or at least one. And, from here at least, it appears we all
have eyeballs. And I think we can all
admit that those parts are better when they are firmly connected to the other
parts of our body; that is when they are at their best. A kidney on its own or a detached eyeball:
not a pretty picture. But when working
within the larger body, the kidney is very important. And when firmly planted in one’s face an
eyeball is not only functional but also beautiful. Context matters.
And that is the genius of Paul’s analogy – one of the reasons
it is, some twenty centuries later, still so widely referenced in the Church: it
reminds us that, the Church, the Body of Christ, is more than the sum of its
parts. An inventory of the complete
collection of parts, without the connections, without the relationships that
bind us together, is like an unopened box of puzzle pieces: fragmented and
lacking. Paul’s point is that we need
each other. We are Christ’s Body through
our connections, because of our relationships.
But it goes beyond that.
Not only do we need each other, we really need each other in all of our
beautiful difference and diversity, because
of our differences and diversity. It’s
not just about having the pieces but a mix of pieces – pieces that fit
together, that support, complement, harmonize.
There are churches out there in which every member is expected to think,
act, vote, and believe in the exact same way.
A friend of mine, who is now a United Church of Christ pastor, applied
to number of seminaries right out of college, seminaries from a wide variety of
Christian traditions. In response to one
of his inquiries, a seminary in a more fundamentalist denomination, sent him
back a list of doctrines, beliefs, and practices; at the bottom of the long
list was a blank space for his signature.
It turns out, they only accepted students who already believed all of
their beliefs, who whole-heartedly agreed with them going in. He did not go there.
A church like that, a church with such a monolithic,
monochromatic, homogeneous population is kind of like a big pile of arms. Maybe everyone agrees, looks alike, sounds
alike, is basically the same, but that is not a body – certainly nothing
resembling the Body of Christ with all of its many and wildly diverse parts.
Not only is that weird, that pile of arms, it is boring,
predictable, and, frankly, not sustainable.
It is much more interesting to have a kidney and an eyeball and a leg
and an ear worshiping together, living together – different and necessary parts
of one and the same body. Bringing all
of their different perspectives on God and the world into this holy
conversation – a conversation that is energizing and revelatory but probably
never resolved. Because every body part
experiences the world differently – even though they all belong to the same
body.
This is one of the gifts of this parish that I value so
deeply. I love that we don’t all think,
vote, believe alike. It is healthy for
us to disagree at times. I want you to
know that you are allowed to disagree with me.
In fact, you should because I am definitely wrong sometimes – just ask
my oldest son, Oscar. And I know that it
can be complicated, sometimes even baffling or frustrating to live in a
Christian community in which such broad perspectives are represented. And I’m OK with that. It might be easier if all of us agreed on
everything all of the time – meetings would certainly be shorter – but that
kind of community looks nothing like the Kingdom of God. I promise you that.
We are each created by God and formed by life in unique and
beautiful ways. We come with strengths
and weaknesses, with flaws and triumphs, with diverse experiences and
perspectives. We bring all of that
amazing messiness into this Christian community we call Grace and St. Stephen’s
Episcopal Church. And together we form
this body – this hauntingly beautiful body – scarred and stunning. And in some mysterious way it resembles the
scarred and stunning body of Jesus.
This tension with which we live; this tension to which we
clutch so stubbornly and preciously is built into our DNA as a parish – a
parish that was formed when two congregations were called by God to become one
church. As you might imagine, that was
no small or easy thing. Grace Episcopal
Church and St. Stephen’s Episcopal Church were two churches for a reason – close
enough, within a few blocks actually, that folks very intentional chose one and
not the other. They had different
histories and preferences and locations and worship styles. The Grace people preferred more Catholic
liturgy; the St. Stephen’s folks liked Protestant worship. And so when they decided to worship as one
church, probably no one was completely happy.
They sacrificed their preferences; they sacrificed their precious
worship spaces – which must have been heart-rending – to build a new space,
this space, together. Individuals had to
adapt to new roles, had to share ministries, had to give up power and authority,
had to relinquish responsibilities, had to watch as things changed. I know it’s
hard to imagine, but I assume the heads of both Altar Guilds had to learn to
co-exist. And both Rectors surrendered
authority and autonomy to co-pastor a newly formed congregation and all of its
many complex issues and diverse parts. I’m
sure it was messy.
And they did it. There
is no way everyone agreed with each other.
But they chose to be together.
And in doing so formed the foundation on which we are still building: a
Church that is generous enough to intentionally hold together all of the many
opinions and beliefs and ideologies and experiences that we bring into this
building. And then despite our
differences and disagreements, and there are differences and disagreements, we
worship together and study together and prayer together and love each other. When one member suffers, we all suffer together
with them. When one member rejoices, we
all rejoice together. Because love does
not require uniformity, just union.
This is our witness in this partisan nation, in this divided
and broken world. There is a love that
has the power to overcome the devastating estrangement of our age, that can heal
brokenness, that transcends our stubborn, entrenched ideologies. There is a love that is big enough to hold us
together, a love that can make one body out of this group of people – and not just
any body, but the body of Christ. Church
is not always easy, because of the people, but because of the people, it sure is
worth it.
Comments
Post a Comment